In an auction, a bidder in position i will never want to pay more
than one bid increment above the bid of the advertiser in position (i + 1), and Google adopted
this principle in its newly-designed generalized second price (GSP) auction mechanism. In the simplest
GSP auction, an advertiser in position i pays a price per click equal to the bid of an advertiser in
position (i + 1) plus a minimum increment (typically $0.01). This second-price structure makes the
market more user friendly and less susceptible to gaming.
Note:
1. Usually in practice, what an advertiser in position i pays is not what the theory states. To maximize revenue, the rank is often not based on bids, but on the product of each advertiser's bid and CTR.
Then the advertiser in position i should pay
bid(i+1)*CTR(i+1)/CTR(i) for per click.
2.
Truth-telling is a dominant strategy under VCG, while truth-telling is
not a dominant strategy under GSP. For instance, consider a slight modification of the example from Section 2. There are still
three bidders, with values per click of $10, $4, and $2, and two positions. However, the click-
through rates of these positions are now almost the same: the first position receives 200 clicks per
hour, and the second one gets 199. If all players bid truthfully, then bidder 1’s payoff is equal to
($10 − $4) ∗ 200 = $1200. If, instead, he shades his bid and bids only $3 per click, he will get the
second position, and his payoff will be equal to ($10 − $2) ∗ 199 = $1592 > $1200.
3. If all advertisers were to bid the same amounts under GSP and VCG, then each
advertiser’s payment would be at least as large under GSP as under VCG.
4. GSP can achieve locally envy-free equilibrium B*. In this equilibrium,
each bidder’s position and payment is equal to those in the dominant-strategy equilibrium of the
game induced by VCG. In any other locally envy-free equilibrium of that GSP can achieve, the total revenue of
the seller is at least as high as in B∗.
Reference:
[1] Benjamin Edelman, Michael Ostrovsky, and Michael Schwarz. Internet Advertising and the Generalized Second-price Auction: Selling Billions of Dollars Worth of Key- words. American Economic Review, 97(1):242–259, 2007.
[1] Benjamin Edelman, Michael Ostrovsky, and Michael Schwarz. Internet Advertising and the Generalized Second-price Auction: Selling Billions of Dollars Worth of Key- words. American Economic Review, 97(1):242–259, 2007.
No comments:
Post a Comment